Guide

How to audit what a website is actually loading.

Every consent project starts with an inventory. Browser observation is essential runtime evidence, and it should be reconciled with source, tag-manager configuration, vendor consoles, CSP reports and server-side data flows.

Time
Estimate: hours for a first pass
Needs
A browser, a clean profile
Output
A categorised inventory
Repeat
On a schedule, not once

Why reading the source does not work

A tag manager loads tags defined elsewhere. A platform app injects scripts at runtime. A plugin adds a snippet on some templates and not others. A third-party script loads a fourth-party script. None of that is visible in a repository, and all of it is visible in a browser.

A small result still needs coverage checks

A site can legitimately set few or no optional cookies, but a small result is not proof of completeness. Check rendered pages, delayed interactions, authenticated and checkout states, regional variants, storage APIs, network requests and server-side integrations before concluding that the inventory is complete.

A method that works

  1. 1

    Start from a clean profile

    A fresh browser profile with no extensions. Existing cookies and an ad blocker will both give you a result that is not what a real first-time visitor experiences.

  2. 2

    Capture before touching anything

    Load the page and record what happened before any consent choice. This pre-consent baseline is the list you actually have to bring under control.

  3. 3

    Cover more than the homepage

    A product page, an article, a page with a form, and the checkout or sign-up flow. Scripts are frequently route-scoped, and conversion tags fire on pages a homepage scan never reaches.

  4. 4

    Look at requests, not just cookies

    A blocked third-party cookie still leaves a request carrying an IP address and a referrer. Storage in localStorage and sessionStorage is inside the same rule and invisible to a cookie-only audit.

  5. 5

    Name the parties

    An inventory of hostnames is not an inventory. Classify each finding to a vendor and a purpose, because the purpose is what the category decision rests on.

  6. 6

    Repeat after consent, and after refusal

    Three states, three captures. The difference between them is the evidence that gating works.

Then stop doing it by hand

A manual audit is a snapshot, and sites change. A verification scan drives a real browser across a set of pages in each consent state and reports findings ranked by impact, on a schedule: weekly on Starter, daily on Growth and Agency.

For the cases a crawler cannot reach (behind a login, a specific checkout state, a customer’s own device), capture a HAR file and import it as an investigation instead.

Common questions

How often should a cookie audit be repeated?

Continuously, in the sense that a scheduled scan should be running. Manually, whenever something structural changes: a new marketing tool, a theme update, a platform app, a site rebuild.

Do I need to audit subdomains separately?

Yes. A subdomain often runs a different stack (a help centre, a status page, a landing-page builder) with its own trackers and frequently no consent implementation at all.

Sources and verification

Verified on . Product-behaviour statements were checked against the current implementation and tests. The links below are the verification basis recorded for this article. They support the stated facts, not a legal conclusion for every site or configuration; recheck changing vendor behaviour before relying on it in production.

See what your own site is loading

A browser scan reports the requests and storage it observed during the sampled journey. Use configured workspace scans to compare the states and pages that matter to your implementation.